Have A Very Mary Christmas!

On This Christmas Eve, We Still Look And Celebrate The Greatest Gift Ever Given To This World, The Lord Jesus Christ! Have A Very Mary And Joseph And Baby Jesus Christmas!

President Bush And Those Flying Shoes!

The Actual Truth About The Flying Shoes????? President Bush Was Filming A Commercial About His Role As Future Spokesperson With His Future Employer... Nunn Bush Shoes!

8th Circuit Court Of Appeals Apparently Out To Lunch So Says "The New England Journal Of Medicine"

Don't You Love It When Pro Abortionist Doctors And Lawyers Take Issue With A Pro Life Ruling By The 8th Circuit Court Of Appeals??? The Justices Called It Like They Saw It And Issued A Ruling That Supported South Dakota's "Informed-Consent" Law.

Sure, I Mean, You Have To Be Kidding... This Law Is Going To Threaten "Physician-Patient" Relationships! You Want Me To Believe That The Abortionist Who Sees His/Her Patient In The Few Minutes Before The Abortion Is Going To Have A "Physician-Patient" Relationship Damaged? I Spend More Time With My Dog's Veterinarian Than An Abortionist Spends With The Victim, I Mean Patient!

I Continue To Be Amazed At How Really Smart People Can Make Such ST_ _ _ D Statements!

Take A Look At The Article In The "New England Journal Of Medicine"

South Dakota's Abortion Script — Threatening the Physician–Patient Relationship (The New England Journal Of Medicine)

Zita Lazzarini, J.D., M.P.H.

"Under a law that went into effect in July, physicians in South Dakota must tell any woman seeking an abortion that she is terminating the life of "a whole, separate, unique, living human being" with whom she has an "existing relationship," that her relationship "enjoys protection under the United States Constitution and under the laws of South Dakota," and that abortion terminates that relationship along with "her existing constitutional rights with regards to that relationship."1

Full Text: "South Dakota's Abortion Script — Threatening the Physician–Patient Relationship."

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/21/2189

Pearl Harbor's Mitsuo Fuchida Gives Us Hope For Impossible People!

67 Years Ago Today On A Sunday Morning.... Pearl Harbor Was Attacked And America Was Rudely Invited Into WWII.

In The Midst Of The Horror and Devastation Of Pearl Harbor An Incredible Miracle Happened In The Life Of The Japanese Pilot Who Shouted The War Cry, "Tora! Tora! Tora!"

The Book, "From Pearl Harbor To Calvary Written" By Mitsuo Fuchida....Sites the incredible story of the lead pilot of the December 7, 1941, raid on Pearl Harbor. Fuchida was the one who shouted the war cry, "Tora, Tora, Tora!" Mitsuo Fuchida fought the United States throughout WWII and was intimately involved in the planning and leadership of the Japanese war effort as flight commander and later as a senior operations officer. After the war, Fuchida was a defeated warrior in occupied Japan, farming to meet the needs of his family. In 1950, Fuchida miraculously came to know Jesus Christ as Saviour through a tract handed to him while exiting a train in Tokyo. The tract was entitled, "I Was a Prisoner of Japan," written by Jacob DeShazer who was one of the famous Doolittle Raiders. Jacob DeShazer trusted Christ as his Saviour while held captive by Japan for 40 months.. Mitsuo Fuchida faithfully served Jesus Christ as an evangelist until his death in 1976. The Book "From Pearl Harbor to Calvary" is Fuchida's testimony of his salvation.

Obama's Presidential Eligibility???

You Have To Appreciate The Forthright Comment Written Today Addressed To the Chicago Tribune's Article On President Elect Obama's Eligibility To Be The President Of The United States... "No matter how much the mainstream media try to run cover for Obama, one fact remains; Obama refuses to disclose his complete birth certificate to the American public; he refuses to disclose his Occidental records to the public; he refuses to disclose his Columbia records to the public; he refuses to disclose his Harvard records to the public; he refuses to disclose 8 years of records as a State Senator to the public; and he refuses to disclose his complete medical records to the public. In short, he is hiding something of monumental proportions, and only a fool would think otherwise."

Thanks Pastor Wade Mobley - Abortion...South Dakota

Afford Unborn The Same Rights As Newborn
Pastor Wade Mobley • Living Word Free Lutheran Church • December 1, 2008

If your child asks you, "Daddy, can I kill it?" you dare not answer until you know what "it" is.

One pivotal question continues to receive little attention in the abortion debate: Just what is it that we are aborting?

We often hear, "No one knows when life begins." But even if this was correct, it does nothing to advance the argument in favor of abortion rights. If we don't know what "it" is, we must protect "it."

So what is the object of abortion? Let's consider the facts:

While philosophical debates continue, modern embryology overwhelmingly affirms that biological life begins at conception - the time when an organism with completely unique DNA arises from the union of sperm and oocyte (Moore and Persaud, "The Developing Human," page 310; Nilsson and Hamberger, "A Child is Born," page 86; Rugh and Shettles, "From Conception to Birth," page 217).

Frequently, though, when someone asks, "When does life begin?" the person is not referring to biological life but to some definition of legal and moral life. Our indistinct language causes us to talk past each other and makes it appear that we have fundamentally different convictions about who possesses basic rights.

For example, a majority of voters support current abortion law, but most people oppose some abortions protected under that law such as:

Having an abortion because you are pregnant with a girl and would prefer a boy.

Having an abortion because you would prefer certain physical traits your fetus doesn't have.

Secondary birth control (multiple or repeated abortions).

Late-term abortion (currently legal for broad reasons even after the baby could survive outside the womb).

For the sake of argument, I will assume that everyone reading this letter opposes the killing of just-born infants, agreeing that newborns possess all the legal and moral rights of adults (with the exception of rights reserved for the majority such as voting and contractual obligations). There are four differences between the unborn and the newborn:

Size: We protect the basic rights of small people just the same as bigger people.

Level of development: An elderly human is a human, an adult human is human, a child human is human, a newborn human is human, and an unborn human is human. We protect human rights independently from stage of development.

Environment: Our human rights are unaffected by our changes of location.

Dependency: A toddler who falls into a pool in your presence is completely dependent on one person - you - for his or her survival. Yet you would deem that child worthy of rescue.

These differences are insignificant, and apart from these differences, a newborn and an unborn child are identical beings.

Pictures of unborn children and those who have been aborted make this painfully evident. You can find them at www.abort73.com.

All people should reply with compassion to those in difficult - even tragic - circumstances. Yet the tragic circumstances of a child's conception should not consign that precious unborn human person to death.

As Steve Wagner, author of "Common Ground Without Compromise," says: If the unborn is growing, it is alive. If it has human parents, it is human. And human life is precious, isn't it?