Thursday, July 10, 2008
Monday, July 7, 2008
"A Great Senior Moment" Support ProLife In South Dakota
Thank You Carol E. Huber For Your Thoughts In The Monday, July 7th Edition Of The Sioux Falls Argus Leader:
"I'm tired of hearing pro-choicers talking about a woman's right to her own body. When a woman is pregnant, the baby's body is a separate person. Granted, it is sheltered in the mother's body, but when we are senior citizens and cannot do for ourselves, are we not sheltered by someone else caring for us? Do others have the right to abort us then?"
"I'm tired of hearing pro-choicers talking about a woman's right to her own body. When a woman is pregnant, the baby's body is a separate person. Granted, it is sheltered in the mother's body, but when we are senior citizens and cannot do for ourselves, are we not sheltered by someone else caring for us? Do others have the right to abort us then?"
Saturday, July 5, 2008
In South Dakota Planned Parenthood Falls Short In Discounting Human Life!
As Of July 2008, The Abortionist At The South Dakota Planned Parenthood Clinic, Will Have To Deliver The Truth About Abortion. The Abortionist Will Inform The Woman That This Procedure "Will Terminate The Life Of A Whole, Separate, Unique, Living Human Being", And That The Woman Has An Existing, Constitutional Relationship With Her Unborn Child.
A 7-4 Decision By The Full 8th U.S. Circuit Court Of Appeals Last Week Ruled Against A Stay On The State’s Informed Consent Law, Passed By The Legislature In 2005.
The Law Stipulates That A Woman Be Informed That Abortion “Will Terminate The Life Of A Whole, Separate, Unique, Living Human Being,”And That The Woman Has An Existing, Constitutional Relationship With Her Unborn Child.
Planned Parenthood, South Dakota’s Only Abortion Provider, Challenged The Law As A Violation Of Abortionists’ Free Speech. The District Court Had Prevented The Law From Taking Effect While The Case Was Being Decided.
The June 27 Ruling Of The Federal Appeals Threw Out The Order, Saying Planned Parenthood Had Not Provided Enough Evidence To Prove That The Statement Was Not True. As A Result, The Court Said, The Statement Is Not Ideological, But Factual, And Thus Could Not Be Considered A Violation Of Abortionists’ Rights.
Why Did Planned Parenthood Fall Short In Their Efforts? Because Their "Smoke And Mirrors" Of Falsehood Regarding The Non Existence Of Human Life In The Womb Was Finally Exposed And Found To Be Embarrassingly Weak And Pathetic! What Else Is Planned Parenthood Alleging And Spouting As Truth??? Will They Wholeheartedly In Their Office Inform The Mother To Be That She Is About To "Terminate The Life Of A Whole, Separate Unique, Living Human Being And That She Has A Existing Constitutional Relationship With Her Unborn Child???" Don't Hold Your Breath!
Congratulations To The Full 8th U.S. Circuit Court Of Appeals For Getting This Right!!! (Well 7 Out Of The 11 Judges Got It Right!)
A 7-4 Decision By The Full 8th U.S. Circuit Court Of Appeals Last Week Ruled Against A Stay On The State’s Informed Consent Law, Passed By The Legislature In 2005.
The Law Stipulates That A Woman Be Informed That Abortion “Will Terminate The Life Of A Whole, Separate, Unique, Living Human Being,”And That The Woman Has An Existing, Constitutional Relationship With Her Unborn Child.
Planned Parenthood, South Dakota’s Only Abortion Provider, Challenged The Law As A Violation Of Abortionists’ Free Speech. The District Court Had Prevented The Law From Taking Effect While The Case Was Being Decided.
The June 27 Ruling Of The Federal Appeals Threw Out The Order, Saying Planned Parenthood Had Not Provided Enough Evidence To Prove That The Statement Was Not True. As A Result, The Court Said, The Statement Is Not Ideological, But Factual, And Thus Could Not Be Considered A Violation Of Abortionists’ Rights.
Why Did Planned Parenthood Fall Short In Their Efforts? Because Their "Smoke And Mirrors" Of Falsehood Regarding The Non Existence Of Human Life In The Womb Was Finally Exposed And Found To Be Embarrassingly Weak And Pathetic! What Else Is Planned Parenthood Alleging And Spouting As Truth??? Will They Wholeheartedly In Their Office Inform The Mother To Be That She Is About To "Terminate The Life Of A Whole, Separate Unique, Living Human Being And That She Has A Existing Constitutional Relationship With Her Unborn Child???" Don't Hold Your Breath!
Congratulations To The Full 8th U.S. Circuit Court Of Appeals For Getting This Right!!! (Well 7 Out Of The 11 Judges Got It Right!)
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Senator John Thune Is Pro Life And Doing Something About The Unborn! Abortion South Dakota
Way To Go Senator John Thune!!!
Senator John Thune Writes..."I recently became an original cosponsor of the Life at Conception Act (S. 3111), which was introduced in the United States Senate on June 11, 2008, and was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. This bill would declare unborn children to be "persons" under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, defining when life begins legislatively. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to resolve this question in its 1973 decision Roe v. Wade, and this bill would effectively dismantle Roe's vague legal and constitutional rationale. In Roe's majority opinion, the court noted that "if this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case [i.e., "Roe"], of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."
Senator John Thune Writes..."I recently became an original cosponsor of the Life at Conception Act (S. 3111), which was introduced in the United States Senate on June 11, 2008, and was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. This bill would declare unborn children to be "persons" under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, defining when life begins legislatively. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to resolve this question in its 1973 decision Roe v. Wade, and this bill would effectively dismantle Roe's vague legal and constitutional rationale. In Roe's majority opinion, the court noted that "if this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case [i.e., "Roe"], of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."
"Ban Will Lead To Lawsuit" - Abortion South Dakota
Argus Leader Article... Aaron O. Curns Writes..."At a time when South Dakota's families are feeling pocketbook pangs at the gas station and in the grocery store, why should taxpayers be further burdened by the price of endless legal fees?
If you are the least bit undecided on the ban, just remember that a "yes" vote isn't just about checking a box; it's also about your checkbook."
DAKOTA VALUES RESPONDS IN THE ARGUS..."Here We Go Again With "This May Cost Us Some Money" If We Limit Abortion In The State Of South Dakota. Heaven Forbid That We May Have To Defend The Law In Court! Why Not Step Up To The Plate And Defend The Unborn?!?!?!?! And If The Wording In The Initiative Is Shocking To You, Please Don't Read Today's Argus Leader Article On The Harrisburg School Story Which Reports That 10 Million Dollars Was Left Out Of The Original Equation! This May Put You Over The Edge!"
A DAKOTA VALUES REMINDER... They Asked For The "Exceptions" And Now The Exceptions Are In Initiative 11. No Surprise That They "Take Exception With The Exceptions!" Now Those Who Favor Abortion On Demand Are Putting The Old "This May Cost Us A Lot Of Money" ("It's Also About Your Checkbook") Reason For Opposing Initiative 11. South Dakotans Don't Be Fooled By Such Vain Arguments!
If you are the least bit undecided on the ban, just remember that a "yes" vote isn't just about checking a box; it's also about your checkbook."
DAKOTA VALUES RESPONDS IN THE ARGUS..."Here We Go Again With "This May Cost Us Some Money" If We Limit Abortion In The State Of South Dakota. Heaven Forbid That We May Have To Defend The Law In Court! Why Not Step Up To The Plate And Defend The Unborn?!?!?!?! And If The Wording In The Initiative Is Shocking To You, Please Don't Read Today's Argus Leader Article On The Harrisburg School Story Which Reports That 10 Million Dollars Was Left Out Of The Original Equation! This May Put You Over The Edge!"
A DAKOTA VALUES REMINDER... They Asked For The "Exceptions" And Now The Exceptions Are In Initiative 11. No Surprise That They "Take Exception With The Exceptions!" Now Those Who Favor Abortion On Demand Are Putting The Old "This May Cost Us A Lot Of Money" ("It's Also About Your Checkbook") Reason For Opposing Initiative 11. South Dakotans Don't Be Fooled By Such Vain Arguments!
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Colorado's Public Restroom Legislation Senate Bill 200 Belongs In The Toilet!!!
From Richard Nixon's "Hatchet Man" To "Born Again" Christian Believer, Chuck Colson Comments on the new BATHROOM LAW TO HELP THE TRANSGENDERED. "Last week, Colorado’s legislature passed—and Gov. Bill Ritter signed—a law that will open all public accommodations, including public restrooms, to anyone who wants to use them. That means men may use a women’s restroom, and women may enter men’s rooms. The rationale for Senate Bill 200 is that transgenders should be able to use the restroom they feel most comfortable using. Apparently, it is not important if others feel uncomfortable having their privacy violated every time they use public facilities.
The lack of privacy is not the only problem. Nobody is going to ask a man if he is trangendered before allowing him into the ladies’ room. This means any man—including a child molester—could simply follow a little girl into the privacy of a public restroom. And, if a man decided to expose himself to a young girl there, who is she going to complain to? After all, restrooms, by definition, are places where one exposes the private parts of one’s body."
The lack of privacy is not the only problem. Nobody is going to ask a man if he is trangendered before allowing him into the ladies’ room. This means any man—including a child molester—could simply follow a little girl into the privacy of a public restroom. And, if a man decided to expose himself to a young girl there, who is she going to complain to? After all, restrooms, by definition, are places where one exposes the private parts of one’s body."
Friday, June 6, 2008
Abortion South Dakota...They're At It Again!
Dave L. Wegner's Editorial..."Abortion Ban Will Fail To Deliver On Promises" As Printed On Thursday, June 5th, In The Sioux Falls Argus Leader, Abandons Fact And Truth!
Dakota Values' Answer In The Argus Leader Provides A Rebuttal And Delivers Fact And Truth!
"Dave L Wegner's article on abortion is misleading to say it mildly. Truth and fact are forgotten. For example the truth is, 1. government law and policy have stopped abortion in many instances. Also the fact is that the numbers of back alley abortions prior to Roe V Wade were inflated to support the so call need for safe abortions. 2. "Doctor's minds being clouded..." The fact is that in 2006 in South Dakota hundreds of doctors publicly supported ending abortion in our state. 3. Be reminded that the 2008 Initiative (11) is not the same legislation that was voted on in 2006. The exceptions were asked for and they were added! 4. "LIFE" is the reason that the Catholic Church is opposed to abortion. Augustine was a proponent of life and would be aghast with the thought of abortion. 5. The Bible firmly and loudly supports that life exists in the womb... Psalm 139, Jeremiah 1:5. Please read the punishment for harming life in the womb, . Exodus 21:22-25. Truth & facts!"
Dakota Values' Answer In The Argus Leader Provides A Rebuttal And Delivers Fact And Truth!
"Dave L Wegner's article on abortion is misleading to say it mildly. Truth and fact are forgotten. For example the truth is, 1. government law and policy have stopped abortion in many instances. Also the fact is that the numbers of back alley abortions prior to Roe V Wade were inflated to support the so call need for safe abortions. 2. "Doctor's minds being clouded..." The fact is that in 2006 in South Dakota hundreds of doctors publicly supported ending abortion in our state. 3. Be reminded that the 2008 Initiative (11) is not the same legislation that was voted on in 2006. The exceptions were asked for and they were added! 4. "LIFE" is the reason that the Catholic Church is opposed to abortion. Augustine was a proponent of life and would be aghast with the thought of abortion. 5. The Bible firmly and loudly supports that life exists in the womb... Psalm 139, Jeremiah 1:5. Please read the punishment for harming life in the womb, . Exodus 21:22-25. Truth & facts!"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
