Not So Fast Ladies! "Seriously, This Issue Needs To Be Put To Rest"

Ladies at http://www.dakotawomen.blogspot.com/, You Sure Would Like To Put This Issue To Rest But It Just Woke Up! How Can You Attempt To End Our Discussion By Saying...

A fabulous e-mailer (Your Opinion) had the following to say:
"Dakota Values has no idea what they are talking about. Section 2 of Measure 11 is very explicit. Any person who knowingly performs any procedure upon a pregnant woman, or uses any instrument upon a pregnant woman…with the intent of causing the termination of the life of an unborn human being is guilty of performing an illegal abortion. In the case of the Campbells an 18-gauge radio frequency needle was inserted through the abdomen of the mother and targeted the umbilical cord with the specific intent to end the life of the sicker twin. It was an intentional death. Everyone knew what was going to be done in the operating room. Seriously, this issue needs to be put to rest now. The procedure that the Campbells chose with their doctor would be outlawed in South Dakota if IM 11 passed."

THE WAKE UP CALL QUESTIONS: #1. Why Did This "Fabulous E-Mailer" Only Quote From Section 2? Remember I Pointed Out That Section 2, 3, and 4 Of Initiative 11 Were Pertinent To This Discussion. This Fabulous E-Mailer Likes To Pick And Choose In Initiative 11 What Is Favorable To Their Point Of View. #2. Question Number Two Settles How The Law Would Be Adjudicated In The Courts! What Is The Spirit Of The Law??? Answer: To Save Life In The Womb! For This Precious Family, The Campbells, To Say That Initiative 11 Would Have Prevented The Selective Cord Coagulation Procedure To Be Done or This "Fabulous E-Mailer To Say "The procedure that the Campbells chose with their doctor would be outlawed in South Dakota IF IM 11 passed, Is Premature! Just A Reminder To You Ladies As To What The Latest 8th Circuit Court Of Appeals Ruling On Abortion In South Dakota Was??? "An OUCH For You!" (Check This Out With Your Attorney Rather Than The Mysterious "Fabulous E-Mailer"!)

p.s. http://www.dakotawomen.blogspot.com/ I'd Also Like To Hear Your Argument For Not Reporting, Rape And Incest And Reporting The Perpetrator? Just A Hint, Before You Answer! Look At The South Dakota Law Already In Place..."Misprision Of A Felony" 22-11-12. Misprision of felony--Misdemeanor. Any person who, having knowledge, which is not privileged, of the commission of a felony, conceals the felony, or does not immediately disclose the felony, including the name of the perpetrator, if known, and all of the other relevant known facts, to the proper authorities, is guilty of misprision of a felony. Misprision of a felony is a Class 1 misdemeanor. There is no misprision of misdemeanors on petty offenses.
Source: SL 1976, ch 158, § 11-6; SL 2005, ch 120, § 205.