"The Sanford Memo" Conveniently Leaked To The South Dakota Campaign For Healthy Families Who Opposes Initiative 11 , Has Caused a Brouhaha.
Be Reminded That This Is Another Distraction From The Original Intent Of The Initiative!
Number 1... WE MUST REMEMBER IT IS FROM LAWYERS! The Sanford Lawyers, If They Could, Would Reduce Patient Numbers Down To Zero Just To Reduce Possible Lawsuits! In The Memo, They Exercise Extreme Caution And Verbalize Any Possible Effect That Initiative 11 Would Have On Their Institution!
Number 2... THE INTENT OF THE INITIATIVE? Not To Make Life Difficult For Sanford But To End Abortion Being Used For Birth Control And To Save The Lives Of 800 Unborn Babies In Suth Dakota.
Number 3... Sanford President and Chief Executive Officer Kelby Krabbenhoft described The Memo as an "unbiased and factual analysis," The Memo Has Become "Biased" As It Was Conviently Dropped Into The Hands Of The Opposition. They Will Use It As "Smoke And Mirrors" To Try To Dissuade The Voters On Initiative 11. "Factual" Impossible In The Hands Of The Opposition, They Will Spin It For Their Own Political Purposes!
Number 4... Krabbenhoft said, " The analysis wasn't intended to be released to the public" Kelby, This Makes The Public Question The Security Of Our Medical Records And The Hospital's Confidentiality.
Number 5... "Sanford has no intention of taking a stance on the initiative, Krabbenhoft said." Sorry Kelby, Your Lawyers Already Took A Stand And Did It For You. The Opposition To Initiative 11 Will Add Energy To The Statements In The Memo And Be The Mouthpiece For Your Hospital Lawyers!
Now Is The Perfect Time To State your Support For Initiative 11! At The Current Time Your Lawyers, Representing You And The Hospital, Have Stamped A "No" On Initiative 11!
The Public Is Waiting To hear From You!
VOTE "YES' ON SOUTH DAKOTA INITIATIVE 11"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I have a thought...how about those who want to ban abortion, put their name on a list and we'll go ahead and pass this and then those troubled women, when they are in poverty and on drugs etc and want to give up their children we start to go down that list and place those children in the homes of the people on the list? It is just a thought. If we want to solve a problem, I feel we as a people should follow through, not just dictate what we think is right and then walk away from the situation.
I am really not affected or passionate one way or another on the issue, but I think it is interesting that anyone can say what they think is the way people should live their lives (ie religion, etc) but until they actually participate actively in solving the problem full circle, how are they really to tell someone else how to live their lives or what to do?
Post a Comment